EFFIGIES and MARKERS

Friday, January 16, 2015

Nathaniel Jenkins: Another brick in the wall of liberty

Baptist persecution and religious liberty in early-colonial America
Religious Freedom Day, 16 January

© 2015 Christy K Robinson 

            If you’re the slightest bit familiar with my blog, William and Mary Dyer, you know that Mary Dyer laid down her life for the cause of religious liberty, or “liberty of conscience,” as it was called. Her husband William Dyer, the first attorney general in North America, was one of the founders of Portsmouth and Newport, Rhode Island, which group stated, in contrast with the other colonies’ theocracies, that they were a secular democracy (religion and government were separated). William was active in the Rhode Island legislature and was instrumental in the groundbreaking 1663 charter of liberties granted by King Charles II, that allowed the separation of church and state, and the freedom to do what the conscience dictated in religious matters. That was the very beginning of the human right that would be codified in the great First Amendment to the United States Constitution, 130 years later.
The story of the three Baptists' persecution is told in the
book, Mary Dyer Illuminated, available in paperback and Kindle.

See this link for information on the five-star-reviewed book:
http://bit.ly/RobinsonAuthor


            I was researching ancestors in New Jersey. I knew that they had been Baptists living north of Salem, Massachusetts. That area, the place where Massachusetts Gov. John Endecott lived, was inhabited by the most extreme fundamentalist Puritans, who had tried to suffocate some Quakers and tried to sell others into slavery. They’d imprisoned and severely whipped Quakers, too.
            But before the Quakers, there were Baptists. In 1651, the good Christians of Massachusetts imprisoned three Baptists from Newport who had gone up to Lynn (five miles south of Salem) to administer Communion to an old, blind man, William Witter, who had become a Baptist. After a trial, Dr. John Clarke was fined £20 (a huge amount of money), Obadiah Holmes £30, and William Crandall £5. If they refused to pay the fine, they would be whipped, a stripe for a pound. They refused to pay. Clarke and Crandall were released on the way to their flogging because sympathetic onlookers took up a collection and paid their exorbitant fines and hustled them away as they protested, but Obadiah Holmes refused to allow a fine to be paid for him. He wanted the vicious hatred of the persecutors to be shown to the Puritan colonists.  
            The scourge had three branches of hard leather, so that the 30 strokes left 90 gashes—and hideous scars for a lifetime. It was laid on so hard that the people begged the executioner to stop, worried that he’d kill Holmes. As his blood sprayed, Holmes said, ‘Though my flesh should fail, yet God will not fail: so it pleased the Lord to come in, and fill my heart and tongue as a vessel full, and with audible voice I break forth, praying the Lord not to lay this sin to their charge, and telling the people I found He did not fail me, and therefore now I should trust Him forever who failed me not.’ Afterward, when the pain did set in and he was recovering, Holmes insisted that his flogging felt like it had been done with roses, and that he bore the marks of the Lord Jesus.
            In 1651, after John Clarke went to London to act as Rhode Island’s agent (and procure a new charter for the colony), Holmes became the pastor of the Newport Baptists.


***************
            I had families of Ayers, Bowens, Davis, Swinney, and others who had emigrated from Wiltshire and south Wales, to Salem and Ipswich, presumably as Puritans during the Great Migration. One of the Ayers women had a brother who was an officer at Mary Dyer’s execution in Boston.
            But after some time, they became Baptists (perhaps as a result of seeing persecution unleashed on their neighbors), and moved temporarily to the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border at Swansea, before leaving there in 1687 to found Bowentown, New Jersey. They formed a Baptist church at Cohansey, and when a number of them, including the Irish Baptist immigrant, John Swinney, became Sabbatarians in the 1710s, they formed the Shiloh Seventh Day Baptist Church a few miles away. One of their ministers, who seemed (according to my research) to serve both the Saturday and Sunday churches, was a Welshman named Rev. Nathaniel Jenkins.  
St. Ursula's Church, Llangwyryfon, Cardiganshire, where
Jenkins was baptized as an infant
.
           Nathaniel Jenkins was born and baptized (meaning his parents were not Baptist because Baptists believed in the choice to be baptized after the age of accountability) in Llangwyryfon, a tiny farming village near Aberystwyth, Wales.
            He would have become a Baptist as a child or young man and studied theology in Wales or England. And he would have been exceptionally bright, to be able to be sponsored for university fees--certainly parents in a tiny farm village (still tiny even to this day) would not have had the means.
          He married Esther Jones, and they had several children before emigrating to New Jersey in 1710. He served as a Baptist minister in the First Baptist Church for 18 years at the fishing and whaling community of Cape May, NJ.
            During that time, he served as a Trustee in the Loan Office and was elected as a member of the colonial Council, which was equivalent to today’s state legislature. In 1721, a bill was introduced in the assembly,  
"to punish such as denied the doctrine of the Trinity, the Divinity of Christ and the Inspiration of the Scriptures." 
(This appears to be related to Baptist groups and the Unitarian movement in England, holding a doctrinal conference called the Salter’s Hall Controversy in 1719.) 
The meeting house in Cape May, New Jersey,
built in 1715, when Nathaniel Jenkins
was the minister. Image courtesy of 
http://mainebaptist.blogspot.com/2011/02/meetinghouse-at-cape-may-new-jersey.html
 
            But Nathaniel Jenkins, highly educated and respected Baptist minister that he was, boldly spoke against the bill. The Welshman stood on the platform of "soul liberty," which was another term for “liberty of conscience” or religious liberty, granted to Rhode Island in 1663 by King Charles II, after the work of Mary and William Dyer, Rev. Roger Williams, many who had been persecuted in Massachusetts, and (wait for it!) Rev. John Clarke and Obadiah Holmes (the Baptist who was whipped). In fact, Obadiah Holmes’ son, by the same name and also a Baptist minister, had moved from Newport to New Jersey and was well known to the New Jersey Baptists.
            In the assembly, Nathaniel Jenkins declared that  

“although I believe these doctrines as firmly as the warmest advocate of the bill, yet I would never consent to oppose those who rejected them with law or with any other weapon than argument.”  
           Jenkins said his theology actually was similar to the bill's sponsor, so it might have helped his town and congregation to outlaw dissenters like those in the Unitarian movement. But he recognized the injustice of enforcing  religious thought and behavior through the government. Government-plus-religion always results in oppression. Whether it was his reference to the religious liberty struggles in the American colonies, the justice and logic of his statement, or his standing in the community, the bill was accordingly quashed. Voted down. Dead legislation. Not going to happen. Thanks to the testimony of the saints who'd gone before, and thanks to the principles of Nathaniel Jenkins.
            Did I mention I love history? Soul liberty is in my blood!
            During his pastorate at Cape May, branches of the Baptist church were established at Salem, Pittsgrove, and Great Egg Harbor. Jenkins spoke at a number of Baptist churches in Pennsylvania and New Jersey in the 1720s, and was called to Cohansey and Shiloh on a permanent basis in 1728, and remained their minister for 25 years. 
           One of his sons was also named Nathaniel, and the son took over the pastorate of the Cape May church for a short time when his father was called inland. But the son was an alcoholic, dismissed from the pulpit, and died in his fifties.
            The Bowens, Swinneys, and Ayers families stayed in the same church for decades, and siblings of one family married siblings of the other family, so that my pedigree repeats itself a bit in the 1700s. There was no consanguinity, however. The Swinneys moved west to Indiana and eventually Iowa. They remained Seventh-day Baptists for 200 years.
            While researching something else, I found a mention of Nathaniel Jenkins, where he and other Welsh Baptists wanted to investigate a legend they'd heard about a Welsh prince discovering America in 1170. I wrote about it HERE.
            Rev. Jenkins died August 2, 1754, in the 77th year of his age, still a minister, and is buried in the Baptist graveyard at Cohansey, Shepperd's Mill, New Jersey.
  In this second house the church continued to worship during the pastorate of Mr. BROOKS [also my ancestor!], who died in 1716 in his 55th year and that of his successors, Rev. William BUTCHER, who became pastor in 1721 and died in the service December 12th 1724 aged 27. During the pastorate of his successors, Rev. Nathaniel JENKINS who in 1730 removed to Cohansey from the first Cape May church, the third meetinghouse was built on the same site in 1741. It was a frame one 36 by 32 feet in size and Morgan EDWARDS in 1789 wrote: The house is finished as usual, and is accommodated with a stove, something not usual in that time, the small foot-stoves filled with hot coals, brought by the worshippers, being in that day the only way of counteracting the cold most meetinghouses.
     In this house Mr. JENKINS finished his labors on earth, dying June 2nd, 1754 aged 76. Rev. Robert KELSEY succeeded him in 1756 and spent his life ministering to the people from this pulpit, dying May 30th 1789, aged 78 years. Source: Cohansey Baptist Church history. They are incorrect about Rev. Jenkins dying in June because the calendar convention at the time was "the second day of sixth month," on the Julian calendar which began in March--so the death date should be 2 August 1754.

My parents visited the Cohansey and Shiloh locations in the spring of 1976, and made acquaintance with distant cousins who still lived there, still Seventh-day Baptists. Nathaniel Jenkins was my 7th-great-grandfather.
*****
See comments on http://baptistnews.com/culture/social-issues/item/30066-critics-say-national-day-of-prayer-divides-americans-by-faith 
You may think that a national day of prayer, a Ten Commandments plaque at the courthouse, prayer in schools or council meetings, or mandatory closures on Sunday as advocated by the government are small things. But they are the camel's head in the tent. Soon, the tent will be full of camel, and you’ll be out in the swirling sand storm. If the lobbyists and “morals police” win on one point, they’ll keep coming at us with more.

People died in this country and elsewhere, for the right to keep government separate from religion, and still allow the freedom to worship God as you feel called. Don't trample their blood in your eagerness to wave your Bible and feel patriotic and evangelical. I hope you use the link at the top of the article to read about Mary Dyer and her death for religious liberty.


Christy K Robinson is author of the books:
·          We Shall Be Changed (2010)
·          Mary Dyer Illuminated (2013)
·          Mary Dyer: For Such a Time as This (2014)
·          The Dyers of London, Boston, & Newport (2014)
·          Effigy Hunter (2015)
·          Anne Marbury Hutchinson: American Founding Mother (2018)


 If you enjoy life sketches, anecdotes, and historical details like these, you can find them in the book Effigy Hunter, by Christy K Robinson. It's available in print from Barnes and Noble and Amazon.

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Unusual medieval names and nicknames

Little-known panel in the Bayeux Tapestry!
© 2014 Christy K Robinson

For several years, I’ve collected interesting descriptive names of medieval personages. In the hundreds of years and countless generations before surnames became popular in the 1200s, it was necessary to distinguish one Charles or Robert from another. It looks as if the French culture was much more nickname-oriented than other areas of Europe and Asia. It would be fun to know if the nicknamed ones knew about their descriptors, and how one hairy man came to deserve his name more than some other bearded, pelted man. 

This is not every medieval epithet or nickname, but as I come across them, I’ll add to this list. In the meantime, enjoy!


Wilfred the Hairy, Count of Barcelona (etc.), died 897.

Christy the Author, or Christy the Editornado,
with Yaroslav the Wise, Prince of Novgorod and Kiev,
in St. Sophia church in Kiev.
The bust was sculpted forensically based on Yaroslav's remains.
Photos are rarely permitted, but I was given permission--I think
the Ukrainian officials were impressed that an American
knew a bit about their ancient history.
Charles the Bald, King of France 

Charles Martel the Hammer, 676-741 

Clovis the Riparian

Sigebert the Lame, King of Cologne, died 509

Louis the Stammerer, King of France

Louis VI the Fat, King of France

Eystein the Fart

Alfred the Great

Carloman the Great (Charlemagne)

William I the Bastard / William the Conqueror

Charles III the Simple, King of France, 879-929

Robert the Strong, Duke of Neustria

Fulk the Rude

Geoffrey le Bel (the Handsome)

Hugh Lusignan le Brun (the Brown)
Ivan the Terrible was not an ancestor!

Edward I, Longshanks, King of England

Walter d’Espec / Walter the Woodpecker 1066-1153

Louis the Pious / Louis the Debonnaire, King of France

Robert the Pious, King of France

Louis IV d’Outre-Mer (Exile), King of France, 920-954

Yaroslav the Wise, Prince of Novgorod and Kiev, 980-1054

Edward the Elder, King of England

Edmund Ironside, King of England

Lambert I The Bearded Count of Mons and Louvain, 950-1015

Malcom II the Destroyer or Avenger, King of Scots
Strange name: Elena Rotenhering de la Pole
b. 1287 at Hull, Yorkshire.

Malcolm III Canmore (Longneck or Big Head), King of Scots

Géza I Magnus King of  Hungary, 1040-1077

Béla II The Blind of Hungary

Simon le Scrope (the Crab)

Louis VIII the Lion, King of France, 1197-1226

Philip III the Bold, King of France, 1245-1285

Philip IV le Bel/the Fair, King of France, 1268-1314

William I the Lion, King of Scotland 1165-1214

William Longespee (Long-Sword), son of Henry II

Hugh de Moray, Lord of Duffus, 1162-1214

Hamo Dentatus de Creully, Hamo the Toothy (maybe bucktoothed) 1050-1107 


Roger de Bully, Norman landowner in Nottinghamshire 1028-1098



Reverend Richard P. Goodenough married the daughter of Archbishop of York
 

Garcia IV the Tremulous, King of Pamplona, Count of Aragon d. 1000
 

Adam le Fuckere, William le Fuckere, and Jordan le Cok. Oh, dear.
Apparently, the F-word is a very, very old word. Hat tip to historian Kathryn Warner (Edward II blog) for this image.




Christy K Robinson is the author of five-star nonfiction and fiction historical books, as well as author of Rooting for Ancestors and William and Mary Barrett Dyer websites. You will find her books at http://bit.ly/RobinsonAuthor.


·          We Shall Be Changed (2010)
·          Mary Dyer Illuminated (2013)
·          Mary Dyer: For Such a Time as This (2014)
·          The Dyers of London, Boston, & Newport (2014)
·          Effigy Hunter (2015)
·          Anne Marbury Hutchinson: American Founding Mother (2018)

Monday, October 27, 2014

Edward II, the Unconventional King



 I’m delighted to bring Rooting For Ancestors readers a guest post by Kathryn Warner, medieval historian and author. I’ve been reading her Edward II blog since at least 2007, and we interact frequently on Facebook. I and many others have urged Kathryn, who holds a BA and an MA with Distinction in Medieval History and Literature, to write books, a history like this one, and/or historical fiction based on fact. Finally, she has done so. The book has the endorsement and foreword of historian Dr. Ian Mortimer, and Kathryn has commented in BBC programs.

If you have traced your ancestors back to European medieval aristocracy and royalty, you are almost certainly descended from Edward III, king of England, who reigned during the Black Death and 100 Years War with France. He has literally millions of descendants. And who was Edward III’s father? Edward II. Who’s your daddy? This guy!

Edward II, the Unconventional King
© 2014 Kathryn Warner

King Edward II was born in Caernarfon, North Wales on 25 April 1284, the feast day of St Mark the Evangelist, in the twelfth year of his father's reign as king of England. He was at least the fourteenth and perhaps the sixteenth, and youngest, child of Edward I and his first, Spanish queen Eleanor of Castile. 

Five of his older sisters, Eleanor, Joan, Margaret, Mary and Elizabeth, also survived into adulthood, but his three older brothers John, Henry and Alfonso and at least five other older sisters died young. Edward II was the first of three kings of England to be born in Wales (the others were Henry V in 1386 and Henry VII in 1457), and is one of only two English monarchs in history (the other being Mary I, born in 1516) with a Spanish parent. His much younger half-brothers Thomas of Brotherton, earl of Norfolk, and Edmund of Woodstock, earl of Kent, were born in 1300 and 1301, the only surviving children of Edward I and his second queen Marguerite of France. Edmund of Woodstock was, via his daughter Joan, the grandfather of Richard II, who was also Edward II's great-grandson.

Edward II's maternal grandfather was a Spanish saint and warrior: the great King Fernando III of Castile and Leon, later canonised as San Fernando and made patron saint of the city of Seville, which he had recaptured during the Reconquista of Andalusia in 1248. Leonor or Eleanor of Castile, the twelfth of Fernando's fifteen children, married the future Edward I of England in 1254 when she was twelve or thirteen and he fifteen. Edward II's paternal grandfather was Henry III, king of England from 1216 to 1272, the son of King John of Magna Carta fame. Edward II took after this grandfather far more than Fernando or his father Edward I in many ways - reliance on favourites, military incompetence - and suffered the price for his ineptitude as a leader when he was forced in January 1327 to abdicate his throne to his fourteen-year-old son Edward III, who reigned for fifty years and began the Hundred Years War with France.

Edward II alabaster effigy
in Gloucester Cathedral
Edward II was most unconventional for his time, and to the disgust of many of his contemporaries, thoroughly enjoyed the company of his low-born subjects and taking part in their activities such as digging ditches, thatching roofs and shoeing horses. Contrary to the common modern image of him as seen in Braveheart and much historical fiction, he was tall, well-built, fit, healthy and enormously strong: "physically he was one of the strongest men of his realm," said one chronicler, and many observers wrote much the same thing.

Edward II succeeded to the English throne on 7 July 1307, when he was twenty-three, on the death of sixty-eight-year-old Edward I. He was left an extremely difficult legacy by his mighty father: restless magnates, hostile relations with France, vast debts and an unwinnable war in Scotland, and sadly for his kingdom, he was not the man to be able to cope with such issues. His reign of nineteen and a half years lurched from one crisis to the next, with civil war constantly threatening to break out and Edward's infuriated magnates threatening him with deposition.

Edward II is perhaps best known for his love of and reliance on male 'favourites,' most famously Piers Gaveston, whom Edward made earl of Cornwall and who was executed by some of the English earls, including Edward II's first cousin and greatest enemy, the earl of Lancaster, in June 1312. The king's reliance on his last and most powerful favourite, Hugh Despenser the Younger, was to bring both of them down, when they alienated Edward's queen, Isabella of France, daughter of Philip IV, whom Edward had married in 1308. Despenser was grotesquely executed in November 1326, while Edward was imprisoned at Kenilworth Castle in Warwickshire and in January 1327 forced to give up his throne to his son Edward III.

Stained glass in Gloucester
Cathedral, of Edward III
ordering a memorial tomb
for his father, Edward II.
Mystery surrounds Edward's death at Berkeley Castle in September 1327, and although popular legend has it that he died screaming, impaled on a red-hot poker, much evidence exists to demonstrate that many influential people, including several earls, the archbishop of York and the mayor of London, strongly believed that he was still alive years afterwards, perhaps in Italy. Whatever happened to the king - and it is entirely typical of this most unconventional of men that we don't know for certain when, where or how he died - the tomb built for him at Gloucester Cathedral still exists and remains one of the greatest glories of medieval England.







______________
He is one of the most reviled English kings in history. He drove his kingdom to the brink of civil war a dozen times in less than twenty years. He allowed his male lovers to rule the kingdom. He led a great army to the most ignominious military defeat in English history. His wife took a lover and invaded his kingdom, and he ended his reign wandering around Wales with a handful of followers, pursued by an army. He was the first king of England forced to abdicate his throne. Popular legend has it that he died screaming, impaled on a red-hot poker, but in fact the time and place of his death are shrouded in mystery. His life reads like an Elizabethan tragedy, full of passionate doomed love, bloody revenge, jealousy, hatred, vindictiveness and obsession.

He was Edward II, and this book tells his story. The focus here is on his relationships with his male ‘favourites’ and his disaffected wife, on his unorthodox lifestyle and hobbies, and on the mystery surrounding his death. Using almost exclusively fourteenth-century sources and Edward’s own letters and speeches wherever possible, Kathryn Warner strips away the myths which have been created about him over the centuries, and provides a far more accurate and vivid picture of him than has previously been seen.

The hardcover book is available October 28, 2014, on Amazon UK, Amazon US, Book Depository, The Guardian Bookshop or directly from the publisher, Amberley.



Monday, September 9, 2013

Who were Mary Dyer's parents?

Sorry to break it to you: Mary Dyer was not a Tudor, not the secret child of Arabella Stuart and William Seymour
 

© 2013 Christy K Robinson

 How do you stop a very old rumor, especially if it's hit the internet? I'm going to try, by telling you, repeating it, and saying it again. I will be overly redundant on the matter. Why do I try? Because this blog has received hundreds of search inquiries on this very subject.

Many genealogy pages (and Ruth Plimpton's book) say Mary Dyer's ancestry was royal by virtue of being the secret child of Lady Arabella Stuart and Sir William Seymour. If you've copied that to your records, it's time to erase the false legend now. No researcher has found proof of Mary's parents or her birth or christening record. They have, however, found proof that Mary Barrett had a brother named William Barrett who in the custom of the times was probably named after their father. Please read researcher Johan Winsser's articles at this link.

The pure fiction that Mary was the daughter of nobility and potentially an heir to the throne of Great Britain, was created by a Dyer descendant, Frederick Nathaniel Dyer, in the 1800s, the romantic Victorian era. It resembles many other attempts by conspiracy theorists to create some sort of connection to European royalty, perhaps to explain why a girl with no known background (as yet discovered) had an above-average education and stood out among other women of her time. The romantic notion was that a commoner from Westminster could never have risen socially without a royal background. 
Henry VII of England,
NOT Mary Barrett's ancestor,
therefore not your ancestor.

 The false story is that Mary was the child of Lady Arabella Stuart (3x great-granddaughter of Henry VII), aged 35, and William Seymour (4x great-grandson of Henry VII), aged 22 at time of their secret and illegal marriage. King James forbade their marriage, but they married in secret in early July 1610. The secret was revealed, and by 9 July 1610, Arabella and William were arrested and imprisoned. Separate quarters, as you must imagine! William was in the Tower of London; Arabella was at Lambeth Palace under house arrest. History records that there was no issue from this marriage. That means there was no secret child who would be raised as Mary Barrett.
Lady Arabella Stuart, probably about the time
of her illegal and short-lived
marriage to William Seymour.

 Age 35 was very old for first-time pregnancy in those days. It's called "elderly prima gravida" even today. If Arabella had become pregnant during her one week of married bliss and borne a baby while in custody and under a doctor's care for several maladies, it would have been noticed by servants, royal household personnel, Anglican clergy, or any of the hundreds of Tower of London employees like, oh, say, prison guards--it was impossible to hide something like that, especially since Arabella was a prisoner under a royal-watcher microscope! What about the laboring mother's screams or groans? What about a newborn baby's cry?

But according to FN Dyer's legend, the newborn Seymour child was spirited out of the Tower of London (a prison, remember, with security) and named after and raised by her nurse, the original Mary Barrett or Mary Dyer, and hidden from King James I while he searched for the child who had a better claim to the throne. What a crock of snooty bias! Another point against FN Dyer is that Arabella was not even in the Tower at this time--she was across the river under house arrest.

In early June the next year, the young William Seymour escaped the Tower and fled to France, having missed his connection with Arabella, who also escaped from her journey north to captivity in Durham. She traveled in men's clothes, but was delayed by weather, captured, and returned to prison. If Arabella and William had a child born in March 1611, would they not have taken that child with them to their exile in France? After all, the child was supposed to have had a better heritage for the throne than King James. But King James, a middle-aged man, had been on the throne for years, and had heirs by now, so there was no need, no chance for a Seymour baby to knock him out. That's just not logical.

I've read a false rumor that Arabella Stuart Seymour was killed by King James in 1615 in the Tower of London. No, Arabella actually died--childless--from a self-imposed hunger strike in 1615. You can read their story in detail, which cites letters of all the players involved, here: http://archive.org/stream/arbellastuartbio00harduoft/arbellastuartbio00harduoft_djvu.txt

After Arabella died, there was no reason to keep Seymour in prison, so (no doubt after a large fine paid by his family) he went back to England, and married Lady Frances Devereux in March 1617. They had seven children. Seymour took up a political career, and was a royalist supporter of his much-removed cousins, King Charles I and II. Again, if he had a baby by Arabella, wouldn't he have taken over the upbringing?

Let me be clear: it's impossible for Mary Dyer to have been a Stuart-Seymour daughter.

Really, isn't it MORE remarkable that Mary Dyer was brilliant and accomplished on her own, without a privileged background? Now, please go to your ancestry or genealogy files and DELETE the Stuarts and Seymours from your records. Arabella Stuart Seymour had no issue. No Mary.

Celebrate that you are descended from a brilliant and beautiful woman who became great not because of whose child she was, but because of her conscious choice to lay down her life for her friends.

*********************
Christy K Robinson is the author of five-star nonfiction and fiction historical books, as well as author of Rooting for Ancestors and William and Mary Barrett Dyer websites. You will find her books at http://bit.ly/RobinsonAuthor.


·          We Shall Be Changed (2010)
·          Mary Dyer Illuminated (2013)
·          Mary Dyer: For Such a Time as This (2014)
·          The Dyers of London, Boston, & Newport (2014)
·          Effigy Hunter (2015)
·          Anne Marbury Hutchinson: American Founding Mother (2018)


To join hundreds of friends and descendants of Mary and William Dyer in a discussion of their culture and experiences, follow this Facebook group and the following blog:
http://marybarrettdyer.blogspot.com.

Friday, June 28, 2013

Pilgrim pastor's signature on seditious book

© 2013 Christy K Robinson

Source: Pilgrim Hall Museum, Massachusetts
 My direct ancestor, Rev. John Robinson, 1575-1625, was senior minister to the Separatists who were known, even to themselves, as the Pilgrims. His signature appears in the center panel around the printer's logo in this image of an unauthorized 1605 edition of a book by Sir Edwin Standys. Robinson wrote many papers and books on religion, and was much more evangelical, progressive, and grace-aware than his hard-liner Calvinist colleagues and flock. In his farewell sermon to the departing Pilgrims, he was adamant about giving no offense to others, being slow to take offense, and to be careful of offending God with ungrateful attitude or speech when it seems that things go against us.

John and Bridget's son Isaac Robinson was born about the time the Separatists fled to the Netherlands. Isaac emigrated to Plymouth Colony, Mass., in 1631, and moved around the colony several times. In the late 1650s, though he was not a Quaker, he protested their persecution to his own economic loss in heavy fines. He was assigned to root out heretical Quaker influence, and instead he became "convinced" (converted) of their principles sometime before 1665. At a time when Quakers were fined, whipped, and imprisoned for sharing their beliefs, it looks like they spared Isaac Robinson those punishments. Did they still hold Isaac in high regard because of his father's status in their hearts, even though John had been dead for 40 years?

What a journey of beliefs and principles between father and son, over 60 years' time.

Leiden's Pieterskerk, with the quadrangle of the Jean Pesijnhof
in the foreground. That almshouse replaced the house of
John Robinson in 1683.
Source: Leiden American Pilgrim Museum, Jeremy Bangs.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Rev. Johann Polhemus' deadly scrapes

© 2012 Christy K Robinson

He survived war, bubonic plague, trans-Atlantic travel, 20 years in the equatorial rainforest, two pirate attacks, two years' separation from his wife and children, and he was the first minister of the first Dutch church on Long Island.

Johann Theodorus Polhemus (or Polheim), born in 1598 near Wolfstein, Bavaria, was a Protestant minister who trained at Heidelberg University and ministered as a young man in or near his native town. The Spanish (Catholics) besieged and then held the Bavarian Palatinate (Protestant Calvinists) where Johann’s family lived during the 1620s. A woodcut of the era shows Protestants being hanged in their shirts and underpants by Catholics (note the priests), with their uniforms, boots, and hats heaped on the ground.

Johann married in the 1620s, and his first wife bore him a daughter, who was baptized in the Netherlands in 1629. Nothing more is known of the mother or baby; they could have died of childbirth complications, or perhaps contracted the bubonic plague, which was spread by troop and refugee movements. The plague flared across central Europe during the Thirty Years War, and hopped the Channel to Britain, as well. Plague killed 30,000 Londoners in 1630, and thousands more across the country, but it was much worse on the Continent.

Rev. Polhemus, now a widower, returned briefly to minister in Bavaria, before accepting an assignment by the Dutch West Indies Company, to minister to Recife or Itamaracá, on the easternmost cape of equatorial Brazil. He was aged 37 when he moved to South America in January 1635 as minister to the sugar planters, traders, and Dutch military forts there. 

The Dutch West Indies Company (WIC) set up company towns in Brazil, New Netherland (New York/New Jersey), and of course in the Caribbean. These were settlements primarily for farming, development, and trade for profit, and the territories were owned by the company. The governors were administrators of the business of the WIC, and the pastors, like Polhemus, were meant to minister to the employees of the WIC. Polhemus wasn't "called" by a congregation, but sent by the company who employed him.

Johann Polhemus' important locations:
A. Amsterdam, Netherlands
B. Recife, Brazil
C. Flatbush, Brooklyn, New York
At this time, and throughout the 1600s and 1700s, civilizations all over the world were experiencing the worst effects of the Little Ice Age, when seaports froze and extreme weather caused famine and then disease. It must have been an absolute shock to Johann's system to end up in the tropical rainforest eight degrees south of the equator!

The 17th century was a bloody era. With Spain at war with the Netherlands, thousands of people emigrated from Europe to North and South America. Spain and Portugal were under a united reign until 1640, and ruled Brazil; the Dutch invaded and took over the Recife region for several decades, but the area was far from peaceful. European wars and repression followed refugees to the New World. The Dutch were well known for religious tolerance, and they allowed Jewish refugees from Inquisition Spain and Portugal to practice their faith and culture as they wished, both in European Netherlands and in New Holland, Brazil (not as much in American Dutch settlements). After the Dutch governor was recalled by the WIC board in 1643, Portuguese planters organized a revolt against the Dutch and took control of the plantations and colonies.
Portrait of a Scholar, 1631, by Rembrandt.
This could be how a Dutch minister dressed.

Rev. Polhemus probably didn't wear velvet and lace
in the tropics, though!

In 1643, the 45-year-old Johann Polhemus married 19-year-old Catherina Van Werven, a Dutch woman living in Recife, Brazil. (Her father was Johann’s age.) She bore four children to Johann at their home on the island of Itamaracá, between 1644 and 1649. Then there was an 11-year gap before she had three more children. Perhaps she miscarried several times in the 1650s; in addition, she and her husband were separated by economic circumstances, she in Amsterdam and he on Long Island, for two and a half years. The last three children were born a year apart in Brooklyn, New Netherland.

Johann preached in Dutch, French and Portuguese while in Brazil; he also knew German and Latin, and probably other languages.

In December 1653, the Dutch lost Itamaracá, and the next month they surrendered Recife to Portuguese domination. In January 1654, they’d been given three months to convert to Catholicism and become Portuguese citizens—or leave. Mevrouw (Mrs/Mme) Catherina Polhemus and the little children sailed for the safety of Amsterdam, to collect on Johann’s overdue wages from the Dutch West Indies Company. (Perhaps her father took her there and she lived with him.) Reports there said that “She is a very worthy matron, has great desire to be [with] her husband, and has struggled along here in poverty and great straits, always conducting herself modestly and piously.” I suppose the reference to poverty means she was unsuccessful in her quest to collect wages from the WIC.

Johann Polhemus and the company of Portuguese Jews were
detoured by pirates twice on their journey from Recife to Brooklyn.
 At the same time, Johann Polhemus sailed on a Dutch trader bound for New Netherland (New York), to minister to the Dutch people on Long Island. However, as the ship sailed up the coast of Brazil, or along the Caribbean windward islands, a Spanish privateer (a pirate with licensed wartime powers from his government) took the Dutch ship, its sugar cargo, crew and passengers and their freight, captive to the Cape Verde Islands, off Mauritania in Africa! It’s unknown how long Rev. Polhemus was held for ransom or when he was released, but when he resumed his journey, the ship that carried him and 23 Portuguese/Brazilian Jews was again pirated by a French man-o-war, the St. Charles, which arrived at New Amsterdam in September 1654, four to five months after the refugees’ departure from Brazil. In a September 1654 lawsuit, the French captain sued the Jewish refugees for their "passage" on his ship, but Dominie [Master] Polhemus and other Dutch passengers had already paid their ransom. 

One genealogical website writes that 
“The Dutch dominie [Johann Polhemus or a colleague] complained to the authorities in Holland, asking them not to permit any more Jews to come to the New Netherlands as there was plenty of trouble already with the Quakers, Mennonites, and Catholics. Governor Stuyvesant was told by the Dutch West India Company to leave religious issues alone and to permit the Jewish emigrants to trade in furs in any part of his province, provided they looked after their own people.”
That's very interesting to me because if it was Johann Polhemus, the founding pastor of three Dutch Reformed churches on western Long Island (why not--he wrote other letters to the WIC and church leaders in Amsterdam), his grandmother's maiden name was Hammerstein. Perhaps her family was from the nearby community of Hammerstein Castle. Many Jews have that place name for a surname, too. Did the town give its name to Jewish families later, or did it take its name from them? At the time, Jews didn't usually use surnames, but patronymics, like the Scandinavians: Per Svensson (Peter son of Sven). Jews often used Isaac ben Avram or David ben Jakub--or they used a place name.

The Long Island town where Johann was installed as minister was called Midwout, but is now known as Flatbush, Brooklyn. Johann was the first minister of Flatbush's, Flatlands/Amersfort's, and Brooklyn's first Dutch Reform churches. Dutch Reform beliefs were Calvinist, which (in broad terms) held that the faithful person showed he was part of those predestined to be saved to eternal life, by perfectly keeping God's law. Puritans and Scottish Presbyterians were also Calvinist.
Rev. Polhemus' parishes are at the left (west) side of Long Island
on this 1660 map..
 


Director-General Pieter Stuyvesant, an employee of the Dutch West Indies Company, ordered the Flatbush church to be built so the residents wouldn't have to travel to Manhattan for religious services, and the structure was finished by about 1658. From Johann's letters, it looks like the Dutch WIC loaned the congregation the construction funds, but they paid it back in church tithes and taxes before 1663. The church was 60 or 65 feet long, 28 feet broad, from 12 to 14 feet under the beams, and built in the form of a cross. The minister's dwelling was at the rear of the church. The Flatlands and Brooklyn Dutch Reform churches were organized and built a few years later, and were also Polhemus’ congregations.

Apparently, clergy and missionaries, both ancient and modern, have entered their profession or answered the gospel commission for the promise of eternal reward--not to get rich in this life! Johann couldn’t afford to bring Catherina and children to America for two years. They arrived in September 1656. In 1658, he wrote to his ministerial governing board in the Netherlands.

Rev. Johann Theodorus Polhemus to the Classis of Amsterdam.

Reverend, Very Learned, Most Pious Gentlemen, the Ministers of the Classis of Amsterdam:
Tendering to you my fraternal and respectful salutations, I would express my affectionate regards, with thankfulness to God. I still continue in the discharge of my appropriate duties, seeking to build up the Church of Jesus Christ in this place. We daily trace and observe with increasing clearness, the blessing of the Lord, in the increase of members, and the prevailing good order. We hope you have received favorable reports and testimonies in relation to us. This will comfort me in my old age. I must also, through the advocacy of your Rev. body, secure the provision from the Hon. Company for the satisfaction of my salary yet remaining due for services in Brazil; and for the reunion and support of myself, wife and children. My salary in the new church here, is also so small that it will go a very little way. I cannot keep silent about it any longer. I commend your Rev. body in general, and each member in particular, to the blessing of Almighty God.
Given at Midwout [Flatbush] in New Netherland, June 4th, 1658.
Your Reverences much obliged brother,
J. T. Polhemus.

The Classis (a religious governing division of the Dutch West Indies Company) tossed the salary matter around for several years upon appeals from Polhemus and even Pieter Stuyvesant, but ultimately refused to pay the salary from 1654-1657, saying that Polhemus was no longer in their employ! Even so, Polhemus addressed his reports and letters to the Classis (who also ruled the New Netherland colony) just as he did the above letter: with respect. 

1660, Sept. 29th.
Rev.  J. T. Polhemus to the Classis of Amsterdam.
Rev., Very Learned and Pious Sirs, the Ministers of the Rev. Classis of Amsterdam: —
After offering you all, collectively and individually, my respectful salutations, I would inform you by this of my welfare. I still continue in the discharge of my duties, in my church at Midwout and Amersfort, in New Netherland. I regularly preach every Sunday morning at Midwout, and alternately at each place in the afternoons. I thank God who gives me strength and bestows his blessing upon me, and upon my brethren in the ministry in this country. If it please God to assist me, I shall continue in my work, faithfully performing my service according to the forms and customs of the parent church of the Netherlands. I remain meanwhile
Yours affectionately,

Johannes Th. Polhemus.
When Johann was 72 years old and still preaching part-time, Stuyvesant ordered "forebear ye taxing or levying any sum upon any parte of ye Estate of Domine Paulinus [Polhemus] your Minister until further order." His ministry was still a valuable service to the churches. He died at age 78 in the summer of 1676, when a fellow pastor wrote to the Classis, "The death of Domine Johannes Theodorus Polhemus, the aged minister in the churches of Breukelen, Midwout and New Amersfoort, all on Long Island, gives us occasion to trouble you again" for more pastors to be sent. The congregation had grown to more than 300 members (not counting attendees) during Polhemus' tenure. 
Polhemus Place street sign

Catherina Van Werven Polhemus lived until 1702. Johann and Catherina were buried in the churchyard at Flatbush, 890 Flatbush Avenue, Brooklyn, New YorkThe site holds the record for the longest continual use by its congregation and is now listed as a New York City landmark. There are several streets named Polhemus in Brooklyn and Queens, in honor of Rev. Johann Polhemus. 

***** 
UPDATE: I have many times attempted to reply to comments on my own blogs, while signed in as blog owner and administrator. Apparently, Google Blogger and Apple iMac's Safari browser are not compatible, and haven't been for years, and no one is in a rush to fix it. Neither am I willing to download Chrome so it can invade my system and prove impossible to extract. 
On this article, particularly, I want to reiterate this because there are several comments in this vein: Dominie Polhemus may not have had a Jewish grandmother, despite her surname Hammerstein. Please note the paragraph in the article above, that her family name may have come from the castle town near which they lived. Jews didn't use surnames 400 years ago like they do today. They used patronymics. It seems to me that if Polhemus was one-quarter or more Jewish, he might have been more open and welcoming to their immigration to Long Island. Having a name ending in -stein is not an indication of ethnicity. That said, my ancestry reports show half of one percent Ashkenazi Jewish. But there's no way to tell which of the approximately 2048 ancestors at that distance might have contributed the genes, and the refugee Jews who lived in Brazil and then had to go to New Netherland (New York) would have been Sephardic (Spanish, Portuguese, Mediterranean nations, etc.), not Ashkenazi.

*****
Christy K Robinson is the author of five-star nonfiction and fiction historical books, as well as author of Rooting for Ancestors and William and Mary Barrett Dyer websites. You will find her books at http://bit.ly/RobinsonAuthor.


·          We Shall Be Changed (2010)
·          Mary Dyer Illuminated (2013)
·          Mary Dyer: For Such a Time as This (2014)
·          The Dyers of London, Boston, & Newport (2014)
·          Effigy Hunter (2015)
·          Anne Marbury Hutchinson: American Founding Mother (2018)


*****
Johann and Catherina Polhemus are my ancestors, 11 generations back on my paternal lines. I descend through their eldest child, Adrianna, who was married to Jan Roelof Seibring in her father's church at Midwout/Flatbush.
Polhemus section of the author's pedigree. Click image to enlarge.